arrow
返回

Expert Consensus on Pediatric Urodynamics Reporting Using Modified Delphi Technique

delete2024-07-01
delete2
PRE
AI
K
Kristen M. Meier *
C
Cláudia Mata
J
Jill L. Kaar
A
Adam J. Rensing
A
Anne G. Dudley
A
Alonso Carrasco
B
Beth A. Drzewiecki
B
Brian A. VanderBrink
C
Courtney S. Streur
D
Darius Bägli
D
David J. Chalmers
D
Duncan T. Wilcox
E
Elizabeth B. Yerkes
G
Glen A. Lau
G
Gino J. Vricella
S
Sarah L. Hecht
H
Hillary L. Copp
H
Hans G. Pohl
I
Israel Franco
J
Jennifer Ahn
J
John S. Wiener
J
Jennifer Singer
C
Christopher Long
M
Mélise Keays
M
Michael Daugherty
M
Molly E. Fuchs
P
Paul F. Austin
C
Charlotte Q. Wu
R
Rebecca Zee
R
Rosalia Misseri
S
Stacy T. Tanaka
S
Stuart B. Bauer
K
Kyle O. Rove
DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004000delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Purpose:Urodynamic testing (UDS) is an important tool in the management of pediatric lower urinary tract conditions. There have been notable efforts to standardize pediatric UDS nomenclature and technique, but no formal guidelines exist on essential elements to include in a clinical report. We sought to identify ideal structure and elements of a pediatric UDS assessment based on expert consensus.Materials and Methods:Pediatric urologists regularly performing UDS were queried using a Delphi process. Participants were invited representing varied geographic, experience, and societal involvement. Participants underwent 3 rounds of questionnaires between November 2022 and August 2023 focusing on report organization, elements, definitions, and automated electronic health record clinical decision support. Professional billing requirements were also considered. Consensus was defined as 80% agreeing either in favor of or against a topic. Elements without consensus were discussed in subsequent rounds.Results:A diverse sample of 30 providers, representing 27 institutions across 21 US states; Washington, District of Columbia; and Canada completed the study. Participants reported interpreting an average number of 5 UDS reports per week (range 1-22). The finalized consensus report identifies 93 elements that should be included in a pediatric UDS report based on applicable study conditions and findings.Conclusions:This consensus report details the key elements and structure agreed upon by an expert panel of pediatric urologists. Further standardization of documentation should aid collaboration and research for patients undergoing UDS. Based on this information, development of a standardized UDS report template using electronic health record implementation principles is underway, which will be openly available for pediatric urologists.
Keyword:
pediatric
urodynamics
standardization

期刊

Journal of Urology 封面图
Journal of Urology
IF:
6.8
论文数:
6.6W
被引数:
4.2W

机构

C
children's national health system
学者数:
5.7K
论文数: 4.3K
被引数: 4
D
Duke University
学者数:
6.3W
论文数: 5.7W
被引数: 6.5W
U
university of california san francisco
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 67
U
University of Utah
学者数:
3.0W
论文数: 2.2W
被引数: 4.6W
University of Colorado System 封面图
University of Colorado System
学者数:
6.3W
论文数: 5.5W
被引数: 1.8K
Y
Yale University
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 6.0W
被引数: 10.0W
U
university of pennsylvania
学者数:
9.2W
论文数: 7.8W
被引数: 153
C
children's hospitals & clinics of minnesota
学者数:
737
论文数: 541
被引数: 1
H
hospital for sick children (sickkids)
学者数:
1.1W
论文数: 8.1K
被引数: 16
U
university of colorado anschutz medical campus
学者数:
2.3W
论文数: 1.8W
被引数: 22
U
university of california los angeles
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.2W
被引数: 89
U
university of oklahoma system
学者数:
1.9W
论文数: 1.6W
被引数: 17
M
Maine Medical Center
学者数:
1.8K
论文数: 1.5K
被引数: 491
O
Oregon Health & Science University
学者数:
2.5W
论文数: 2.1W
被引数: 39
U
Utah System of Higher Education
学者数:
4.6W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 161
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.7W
论文数: 33.8W
被引数: 6.6K
U
University of Michigan
学者数:
6.4W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 124
U
university of michigan system
学者数:
9.1W
论文数: 8.6W
被引数: 133
U
university of toronto
学者数:
14.8W
论文数: 12.0W
被引数: 165
P
pennsylvania medicine
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 12
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息