返回
eXplainable and Reliable Against Adversarial Machine Learning in Data Analytics
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3197299.png)
摘要
En 中文
Machine learning (ML) algorithms are nowadays widely adopted in different contexts to perform autonomous decisions and predictions. Due to the high volume of data shared in the recent years, ML algorithms are more accurate and reliable since training and testing phases are more precise. An important concept to analyze when defining ML algorithms concerns adversarial machine learning attacks. These attacks aim to create manipulated datasets to mislead ML algorithm decisions. In this work, we propose new approaches able to detect and mitigate malicious adversarial machine learning attacks against a ML system. In particular, we investigate the Carlini-Wagner (CW), the fast gradient sign method (FGSM) and the Jacobian based saliency map (JSMA) attacks. The aim of this work is to exploit detection algorithms as countermeasures to these attacks. Initially, we performed some tests by using canonical ML algorithms with a hyperparameters optimization to improve metrics. Then, we adopt original reliable AI algorithms, either based on eXplainable AI (Logic Learning Machine) or Support Vector Data Description (SVDD). The obtained results show how the classical algorithms may fail to identify an adversarial attack, while the reliable AI methodologies are more prone to correctly detect a possible adversarial machine learning attack. The evaluation of the proposed methodology was carried out in terms of good balance between FPR and FNR on real world application datasets: Domain Name System (DNS) tunneling, Vehicle Platooning and Remaining Useful Life (RUL). In addition, a statistical analysis was performed to improve the robustness of the trained models, including evaluating their performance in terms of runtime and memory consumption.
Keyword:
Machine learning algorithms
Reliability
Adversarial machine learning
Prediction algorithms
Machine learning
Data models
Safety
Object detection
Machine learning
detection algorithms
adversarial machine learning
reliable
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
9.8W
被引数:
29.4W
机构
引用论文
Analysis and assessment of ship collision accidents using Fault Tree and Multiple Correspondence Analysis基于故障树和多重对应分析的船舶碰撞事故分析与评估

