arrow
返回

Explaining Age Differences in the Memory-Experience Gap

delete2021-09-01
delete11
delete
OA
AI
D
Doerte U. Junghaenel *
J
Joan E. Broderick
S
Stefan Schneider
C
Cheng Wen
H
Hio Wa Mak
S
Sarah Goldstein
M
Marilyn Mendez
A
Arthur A. Stone
DOI:10.1037/pag0000628delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Emotions and symptoms are often overestimated in retrospective ratings, a phenomenon referred to as the memory-experience gap. Some research has shown that this gap is less pronounced among older compared to younger adults for self-reported negative affect, but it is not known whether these age differences are evident consistently across domains of well-being and why these age differences emerge. In this study, we examined age differences in the memory-experience gap for emotional (positive and negative affect), social (loneliness), and physical (pain, fatigue) well-being. We also tested four variables that could plausibly explain age differences in the gap: (a) episodic memory and executive functioning, (b) the agerelated positivity effect, (c) variability of daily experiences, and (d) socially desirable responding. Adults (n = 477) from three age groups (21-44, 45-64, 65+ years old) participated in a 21-day diary study. Participants completed daily end-of-day ratings and retrospective ratings of the same constructs over different recall periods (3, 7, 14, and 21 days). Results showed that, relative to young and middle-aged adults, older adults had a smaller memory-experience gap for negative affect and loneliness. Lower day-today variability partly explained why the gap was smaller for older adults. There was no evidence that the magnitude of the memory-experience gap for positive affect, pain or fatigue depended on age. We recommend that future research considers how variability in daily experiences can impact age differences in retrospective self-reports of well-being.
Keyword:
age differences
memory-experience gap
recall bias
mediators
daily diaries

期刊

Psychology and Aging 封面图
Psychology and Aging
IF:
3.5
论文数:
2.9K
被引数:
1.0W

机构

U
university of southern california
学者数:
4.7W
论文数: 3.8W
被引数: 51
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息