.png){kind=icon}
返回
Explaining Preferences from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1086/694541.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The standard approach in positive political theory posits that action choices are the consequences of preferences. Social psychologyin particular, cognitive dissonance theorysuggests the opposite: preferences may themselves be affected by action choices. We present a framework that applies this idea to three models of political choice: (1) one in which partisanship emerges naturally in a two-party system despite policy being multidimensional, (2) one in which interactions with people who express different views can lead to empathetic changes in political positions, and (3) one in which ethnic or racial hostility increases after acts of violence. These examples demonstrate how incorporating the insights of social psychology can expand the scope of formalization in political science.
Keyword:
formal theory
cognitive dissonance
partisanship
empathy
ethnic violence
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.8
论文数:
5.8K
被引数:
1.3W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
查看更多内容