.png){kind=icon}
返回
Explanation and understanding
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The study of explanation, while related to intuitive theories, concepts, and mental models, offers important new perspectives on high-level thought. Explanations sort themselves into several distinct types corresponding to patterns of causation, content domains, and explanatory stances, all of which have cognitive consequences. Although explanations are necessarily incomplete-often dramatically so in laypeople-those gaps are difficult to discern. Despite such gaps and the failure to recognize them fully, people do have skeletal explanatory senses, often implicit, of the causal structure of the world. They further leverage those skeletal understandings by knowing how to access additional explanatory knowledge in other minds and by being particularly adept at using situational support to build explanations on the fly in real time. Across development and cultures, there are differences in preferred explanatory schemes, but rarely are any kinds of schemes completely unavailable to a group.
Keyword:
concepts
causality
cognition
cognitive development
illusions of knowing
domain specificity
stances
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
29.4
论文数:
1.9K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Stereospecificity of Certain Soluble and Particulate Preparations of Mitochondrial Reduced Nicotinamide-Adenine Dinucleotide Dehydrogenase From Beef Heart.png)
Nature
NatureIF0
PREAI
分享收藏Mature proteins derived from Epstein–Barr virus fail to feed into the MHC class I antigenic pool
PREAI
分享收藏The baculovirus expression vector pBSV-8His directs secretion of histidine-tagged proteinsGene
GeneIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality当可能性告知现实时: 反事实思维作为因果关系的线索
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容