返回
Exploratory cuckoo search for solving single-objective optimization problems
DOI:10.1007/s00500-021-05939-3.png)
摘要
En 中文
The cuckoo search (CS) algorithm is an effective optimization algorithm, but it is prone to stagnation in suboptimality because of some limitations in its exploration mechanisms. This paper introduces a variation of CS called exploratory CS (ECS), which incorporates three modifications to the original CS algorithm to enhance its exploration capabilities. First, ECS uses a special type of opposition-based learning called refraction learning to improve the ability of CS to jump out of suboptimality. Second, ECS uses the Gaussian perturbation to optimize the worst candidate solutions in the population before the discard step in CS. Third, in addition to the Levy flight mutation method used in CS, ECS employs two mutation methods, namely highly disruptive polynomial mutation and Jaya mutation, to generate new improved candidate solutions. A set of 14 widely used benchmark functions was used to evaluate and compare ECS to three variations of CS:CS with Levy flight (CS), CS with highly disruptive polynomial mutation (CS10) and CS with pitch adjustment mutation (CS11). The overall experimental and statistical results indicate that ECS exhibits better performance than all of the tested CS variations. Besides, the single-objective IEEE CEC 2014 functions were used to evaluate and compare the performance of ECS to six well-known swarm optimization algorithms: CS with Levy flight, Grey wolf optimizer (GWO), distributed Grey wolf optimizer (DGWO), distributed adaptive differential evolution with linear population size reduction evolution (L-SHADE), memory-based hybrid Dragonfly algorithm and Fireworks algorithm with differential mutation. Interestingly, the results indicate that ECS provides competitive performance compared to the tested six well-known swarm optimization algorithms.
Keyword:
Cuckoo search
Refraction learning
Single-objective optimization
Mutation method
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.5
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
2.1W

