返回
Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244.png)
摘要
En 中文
The integration of machine learning (ML) systems into various sectors, notably education, has great potential to transform business workflows and decision-making processes. However, this technological advancement brings forth critical ethical concerns, particularly concerning the fairness of decisions affecting diverse groups of people. Our objective was to systematically map out the landscape of ML fairness research in higher education by exploring seven key research questions. These questions span a range of topics from the types of ML algorithms used in education to the methods of fairness assessment and the results achieved in terms of equity. We included 63 primary studies published between 2002 and 2023. The most common setting for AI Fairness research are: traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree), sensitive variables (gender, race, ethnicity), and various definitions of fairness (Group fairness, Demographic parity, Equalized odds). We also identify several future research directions, including fairness assurance for multiple sensitive variables, combining different fairness concepts and metrics, open-source benchmarking tools, and fairness testing for modern ML/AI models.
Keyword:
Fairness
Bias
AI
Definitions of fairness
AI software fairness
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
5.5K
被引数:
8.4K
机构
引用论文
What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective机器学习公平的现状和方法: 调查、反思和视角
Validity of Three-Fluid Plasma Modeling for Alternating-Current Dielectric-Barrier-Discharge Plasma Actuator
AIAA Journal
IF0

