返回
Feature Review Computational ethics
DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.009.png)
摘要
En 中文
Technological advances are enabling roles for machines that present novel ethical challenges. The study of 'AI ethics' has emerged to confront these challenges, and connects perspectives from philosophy, computer science, law, and economics. Less represented in these interdisciplinary efforts is the perspective of cognitive science. We propose a framework - computational ethics - that specifies how the ethical challenges of AI can be partially addressed by incorporating the study of human moral decision-making. The driver of this framework is a computational version of reflective equilibrium (RE), an approach that seeks coherence between considered judgments and governing principles. The framework has two goals: (i) to inform the engineering of ethical AI systems, and (ii) to characterize human moral judgment and decision-making in computational terms. Working jointly towards these two goals will create the opportunity to integrate diverse research questions, bring together multiple academic communities, uncover new interdisciplinary research topics, and shed light on centuries-old philosophical questions.
Keyword:
tive science
tive equilibrium
computational terms
期刊
IF:
17.2
论文数:
3.6K
被引数:
3.5W
机构
引用论文
Machine Ethics: The Design and Governance of Ethical AI and Autonomous Systems机器伦理: 伦理人工智能和自治系统的设计和治理
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
IF25.9
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook在Facebook上接触意识形态多样化的新闻和观点
SCIENCE
IF45.8
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations在用于管理人群健康的算法中剖析种族偏见
SCIENCE
IF45.8
An approach for combining ethical principles with public opinion to guide public policy伦理原则与民意相结合指导公共政策的途径
Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities来自13个国家的公民对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗分配优先事项有相似的偏好

