.png){kind=icon}
返回
Financial statement users? institutional logic
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106819.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In this paper, we investigate what we call financial statement users' institutional logic, defined as users' expressed fundamental views and beliefs about accounting information. We analyze users' comment letters to standard setters in response to the proposed standards on lease accounting to identify the dimensions of the institutional logic that underlie their views on accounting information. Our qualitative analysis identified and validated ten principal dimensions, namely economics and substance, due process issues, measurement, readiness and relevance for use, conceptual foundations, clarity, presentation and disclosure, cost-benefit issues, comparability and consistency, and financial statement manipulation. Quantitative analyses revealed that four of these dimensions, i.e. due process issues, readiness and relevance for use, comparability and consistency, and cost-benefit issues, occupy a medium or large amount of space in users' comments and are referred to in strong terms, while economics and substance and measurement, although also widely discussed, are addressed in weaker terms. Overall, our study begins to fill a gap in the literature by providing insights into users' views on accounting information. These insights challenge the homo economicus user currently constructed in standard-setting debates. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Accounting information
Financial statement users
Institutional logics
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.2
论文数:
989
被引数:
3.9K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏Etude par spectrometrie de photoelectrons de la structure electronique des phenyl-alcynes conjugues
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容