.png){kind=icon}
返回
Flow quantification dependency on background phase correction techniques in 4D-flow MRI
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/mrm.28085.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Purpose To analyze the dependence of flow volume measurements on 3D cine phase-contrast MRI (4D-flow MRI) background phase correction. Methods In 31 subjects scanned on a 1.5T MRI scanner, flow volume measurements at 4 vessels were made using phantom corrected 2D phase contrast and 4D flow with background phase correction performed by linear, second, third, and fourth-order polynomial fitting to static tissue. Variations in the amount and distribution of static tissue were made to investigate the influence on flow volume measurements. Results Bland Altman comparison of 2D phase-contrast and 4D-flow measurements showed low bias (2.3%-4.8%) and relatively large limits of agreement (13.5%-17.6%). Approximately half of this was attributable to sequence and physiological differences between the 2 scan sequences, demonstrated by smaller limits of agreement (5.3%-10.0%) when comparing 4D-flow measurements with differing background phase corrections. Using only 20% of available static tissue points for polynomial fitting resulted in only 1% difference in flow volume measurements. Using asymmetrically distributed static tissue or including nonstatic tissue for polynomial fitting yielded highly variable differences in flow volume measurements, which became more variable with increased polynomial order. Completely asymmetric static tissue selection resulted in high deviations in flow volume measurements (mean > 7%, max = 345%). Conclusion Comparisons between 2D phase-contrast and 4D-flow volume measurements should consider influences from sequence and physiological differences. A subset of static tissue points may be used with low impact on flow measurements, but should avoid the inclusion of nonstatic tissue and avoid asymmetric distribution. Higher-order polynomial fits are more susceptible to inaccurate static tissue selection.
Keyword:
4D flow
background phase correction
eddy currents
flow volume
phase contrast
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3
论文数:
1.2W
被引数:
3.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
In-Scan and Scan-Rescan Assessment of LV In- and Outflow Volumes by 4D Flow MRI Versus 2D Planimetry通过4D Flow MRI与2D平面测量法对LV流入和流出体积进行扫描和扫描重新扫描评估
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Reproducibility of Flow and Wall Shear Stress Analysis Using Flow-Sensitive Four-Dimensional MRI
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容