.png){kind=icon}
返回
Frames and rationality: Response to commentators
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X22001418.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The thoughtful and rewarding peer commentaries on my target article come from a broad range of disciplinary perspectives. I engage with the commentaries in three groups. First, I discuss the commentaries that apply my basic approach to new cases not considered in the target article. Second, I explore those that helpfully extend and refine my arguments. Finally, I offer replies to those that object either to the overall framework or to specific arguments.
期刊
IF:
13.7
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏What you see may not be what you get: Reverse contingency and perceived loss aversion in pigeons
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容