arrow
Return

Functional Sequential Treatment Allocation

delete2021-01-19
delete4
delete
OA
AI
A
Anders Kock
D
David Preinerstorfer *
B
Bezirgen Veliyev
DOI:10.1080/01621459.2020.1851236delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Consider a setting in which a policy maker assigns subjects to treatments, observing each outcome before the next subject arrives. Initially, it is unknown which treatment is best, but the sequential nature of the problem permits learning about the effectiveness of the treatments. While the multi-armed-bandit literature has shed much light on the situation when the policy maker compares the effectiveness of the treatments through their mean, much less is known about other targets. This is restrictive, because a cautious decision maker may prefer to target a robust location measure such as a quantile or a trimmed mean. Furthermore, socio-economic decision making often requires targeting purpose specific characteristics of the outcome distribution, such as its inherent degree of inequality, welfare or poverty. In the present article, we introduce and study sequential learning algorithms when the distributional characteristic of interest is a general functional of the outcome distribution. Minimax expected regret optimality results are obtained within the subclass of explore-then-commit policies, and for the unrestricted class of all policies. for this article are available online.
Keywords:
Distributional characteristics
Minimax optimal expected regret
Multi-armed bandits
Randomized controlled trials
Robustness
Sequential treatment allocation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

J
Journal of the American Statistical Association
IF:
3
Papers:
5.1K
Citations:
4.8W

Organization

C
creates
Scholars:
72
Papers: 84
Citations: 0
A
Aarhus University
Scholars:
4.3W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 4.8W
U
university of oxford
Scholars:
9.7W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 137
researcher View more organizations