返回
Gaussian process versus margin sampling active learning
DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.04.086.png)
摘要
En 中文
There are a large number of unlabeled examples in real-world application, and if the labels of these unlabeled examples are given manually, then the cost will be very high. The problem about how to label these massive unlabeled instances with the minimal cost is paid more and more attention. Active learning efficiently solves this bottleneck by selecting the most informative examples from the unlabeled examples and establishing a classifier with a higher classifier accuracy to label unlabeled examples, which greatly improves work efficiency. In this paper, we compare two kinds of traditional active learning algorithms relying on a single classifier, namely Gaussian process and margin sampling active learning, in two aspects of classification error rates and computing time. Moreover, we compare their improved versions (GPMAL and IMS) which apply the manifold-preserving graph reduction (MPGR) algorithm. MPGR constructs a subset which well exploits the structural spatial connectivity and spatial diversity among examples. By using MPGR, an active learner selects the informative and representative candidates from the subset instead of the whole unlabeled data set. In addition, a comparison with a state-of-the-art active learning method, QUIRE, is provided. Experimental results on multiple data sets show that both GPMAL and IMS have their own advantages. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Active learning
Gaussian process
Margin sampling
Support vector machine
Manifold-preserving graph reduction
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.5
论文数:
2.5W
被引数:
6.5W
机构
引用论文
The variation in the number of roots and canals morphology of permanent mandibular first molar teeth by using cone beam computed tomography imaging in a sample of Erbil city使用锥形束计算机断层扫描成像技术对埃尔比勒市样本中恒下颌第一磨牙的根和根管形态数量变化的研究
Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD确定MCDM问题中标准权重的客观方法的特定特征: 熵,批评家和SD

