arrow
返回

Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages

delete2009-08-01
delete289
delete
OA
AI
C
Carla L. Hudson Kam *
E
Elissa L. Newport
DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
When natural language input contains grammatical forms that are used probabilistically and inconsistently, learners will sometimes reproduce the inconsistencies; but sometimes they will instead regularize the use of these forms, introducing consistency in the language that was not present in the input. In this paper we ask what produces such regularization. We conducted three artificial language experiments, varying the use of determiners in the types of inconsistency with which they are used, and also comparing adult and child learners. In Experiment I we presented adult learners with scattered inconsistency - the use of multiple determiners varying in frequency in the same context - and found that adults will reproduce these inconsistencies at low levels of scatter, but at very high levels of scatter will regularize the determiner system, producing the most frequent determiner form almost all the time. In Experiment 2 we showed that this is not merely the result of frequency: when determiners are used with low frequencies but in consistent contexts, adults Will learn all of the determiners veridically. In Experiment 3 we compared adult and child learners, finding that children will almost always regularize inconsistent forms, whereas adult learners will only regularize the most complex inconsistencies. Taken together, these results suggest that regularization processes in natural language learning, such as those seen in the acquisition of language from non-native speakers or in the formation of young languages, may depend crucially on the nature of language learning by young children. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Language acquisition
Linguistic input
Probability learning
Miniature artificial languages
Second language learning
Regularization
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Cognitive Psychology 封面图
Cognitive Psychology
IF:
3
论文数:
1.0K
被引数:
7.8K

机构

U
University of California Berkeley
学者数:
3.5W
论文数: 2.8W
被引数: 11.3W
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.7W
论文数: 33.8W
被引数: 6.6K
引用论文

引用论文

Aging of sensorimotor processes: a systematic study in Fitts’ task
err2013-05-07
err0
PREAI
errJean-Jacques Temprado; Rita Sleimen-Malkoun; Patrick Lemaire; Benoit Rey-Robert; Frédérique Retornaz; Eric Berton
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Comparative Inhibitory Activity of Rofecoxib, Meloxicam, Diclofenac, Ibuprofen, and Naproxen on COX‐2 versus COX‐1 in Healthy Volunteers
err2013-03-08
err0
PREAI
errAnne van Hecken; Jules I. Schwartz; Marleen Depré; Inge de Lepeleire; Aimee Dallob; Wesley Tanaka; Kathleen Wynants; Agnes Buntinx; Jef Arnout; Peggy H. Wong; David L. Ebel; Barry J. Gertz; Paul J. de Schepper
err分享
err收藏
Thrombosis in patients with connective tissue diseases treated with specific cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors: A report of four cases
err2001-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errLeslie J. Crofford; Jim C. Oates; W. Joseph McCune; Samardeep Gupta; Mariana J. Kaplan; Francesca Catella-Lawson; Jason D. Morrow; Kevin T. McDonagh; Alvin H. Schmaier
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容