.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Howe's (2009) critique of positivistic tendencies in the education research community is valuable and pertinent. His analysis is nonetheless one-sided, finding fault with one side of current divisions alone. In an effort to retain the good points of his analysis, the author first summarizes Howe's argument, interpreting it as a critique of hasty and dogmatic reductionism. He then considers parallel problems arising from hasty and dogmatic holism that Howe does not address. Following this discussion, a third, temporal approach is suggested in which analytic and synthetic perspectives are used to suggest and modify one another in a cycle, rather than being taken as fixed stances. Adopting this approach could help reduce the dogmatism evident in the methodology wars, although struggles for advantage would clearly remain.
Keyword:
education
epistemology
methods
philosophy
pragmatism
research
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.9
论文数:
1.1K
被引数:
9.0K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Hsp70 Is a New Major Regulator of Erythropoiesis by Preventing Caspase-3-Mediated Cleavage of GATA-1..png)
Blood.png)
OAAI
BloodIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
没有更多内容
没有更多内容