arrow
返回

Governing ghostbots

delete2023-04-01
delete16
delete
OA
AI
E
Edina Harbinja *
L
Lilian Edwards
M
Marisa McVey
DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105791delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This article discusses the legal implications of a novel phenomenon, namely, digital reincar-nations of deceased persons, sometimes known as post-mortem avatars, deepfakes, repli-cas, holographs, or chatbots. To elide these multiple names, we use the term 'ghostbots'. The piece is an early attempt to discuss the potential social and individual harms, roughly grouped around notions of privacy (including post-mortem privacy), property, personal data and reputation, arising from ghostbots, how they are regulated and whether they need to be adequately regulated further. For reasons of space and focus, the article does not deal with copyright implications, fraud, consumer protection, tort, product liability, and pornography laws, including the non-consensual use of intimate images (`revenge porn'). This paper fo-cuses on law, although we fully acknowledge and refer to the role of philosophy and ethics in this domain.We canvas two interesting legal developments with implications for ghostbots, namely, the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act and the 2021 New York law amending pub-licity rights to protect the rights of celebrities whose personality is used in post-mortem `replicas'. The latter especially evidences a remarkable shift from the norm we have chroni-cled in previous articles of no respect for post-mortem privacy to a growing recognition that personality rights do need protection post-mortem in a world where pop stars and actors are routinely re-created using AI. While the legislative motivation here may still be primar-ily to protect economic interests, we argue it also shows a concern for dignitary and privacy interests.Given the apparent concern for the appropriation of personality post-mortem, possibly in defiance or ignorance of what the deceased would have wished, we propose an early solution to regulate the rise of ghostbots, namely an enforceable `do not bot me' clause in analogue or digital wills.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Keyword:
Ghostbots
Deepfakes
Post-mortem privacy
Digital legacy
Digital remains
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Computer Law and Security Review 封面图
Computer Law and Security Review
IF:
3.2
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
2.2K

机构

Q
Queen's University Belfast
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.7W
被引数: 2.5W
N
newcastle university - uk
学者数:
2.9W
论文数: 2.6W
被引数: 39
A
Aston University
学者数:
4.8K
论文数: 5.6K
被引数: 8.8K
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息