arrow
返回

Grounding Computational Cognitive Models

delete2025-01-06
delete0
delete
OA
AI
C
Casimir J. H. Ludwig *
E
Erik Stuchlý
G
Gaurav Malhotra
DOI:10.1037/rev0000533delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Cognitive scientists and neuroscientists are increasingly deploying computational models to develop testable theories of psychological functions and make quantitative predictions about cognition, brain activity, and behavior. Computational models are used to explain target phenomena such as experimental effects, individual, and/or population differences. They do so by relating these phenomena to the underlying components of the model that map onto distinct cognitive mechanisms. These components make up a cognitive state space, where different positions correspond to different cognitive states that produce variation in behavior. We examine the rationale and practice of such model-based inferences and argue that model-based explanations typically miss a key ingredient: They fail to explain why and how agents occupy specific positions in this space. A critical insight is that the agent's position in the state space is not fixed, but that the behavior they produce is the result of a trajectory. Therefore, we discuss (a) the constraints that limit movement in the state space; (b) the reasons for moving around at all (i.e., agents' objectives); and (c) the information and cognitive mechanisms that guide these movements. We review existing research practices, from experimental design to the model-based analysis of data, and through simulations we demonstrate some of the inferential pitfalls that arise when we ignore these dynamics. By bringing the agent's perspective into sharp focus, we stand to gain better and more complete explanations of the variation in cognition and behavior over time, between different environmental conditions, and between different populations or individuals.
Keyword:
computational model
individual differences
model-based inference
sampling
temporal dynamics

期刊

Psychological Review 封面图
Psychological Review
IF:
5.8
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
3.2W

机构

U
university of hamburg
学者数:
3.7W
论文数: 2.9W
被引数: 30
S
state university of new york (suny) system
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 5.8W
被引数: 65
U
University of Bristol
学者数:
3.1W
论文数: 3.0W
被引数: 5.3W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息