返回
How do we track invisible objects?
DOI:10.3758/BF03193879.png)
摘要
En 中文
We previously demonstrated that observers in multiple object tracking experiments can successfully track targets when all the objects simultaneously vanish for periods lasting several hundred milliseconds (Alvarez, Horowitz, Arsenio, Dimase, & Wolfe, 2005). How do observers do this? Since observers can track objects that move behind occluders (e.g., Scholl & Pylyshyn, 1999), they may treat a temporal gap as a case of complete occlusion. If so, performance should improve if occlusion cues (deletion and accretion) are provided and items disappear and reappear one by one (asynchronously), rather than simultaneously. However, we found better performance with simultaneous than with asynchronous disappearance (Experiment 1), whereas occlusion cues were detrimental (Experiment 2). We propose that observers tolerate a gap in tracking by storing the current task state when objects vanish and resuming tracking on the basis of that memory when the objects reappear (a task-switching account).
Keyword:
MULTIELEMENT VISUAL TRACKING
WORKING-MEMORY
MULTIPLE
SEARCH
ATTENTION
SURFACES
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
P
IF:
3
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Effect of tamoxifen in RAFT miniemulsion polymerization during the synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles他莫昔芬在RAFT微乳液聚合合成聚合物纳米粒过程中的作用
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine (CA) Vs Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin (CI) Vs Clofarabine, Idarubicin, Plus Cytarabine (CIA) as Salvage Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).
Blood
IF0
Microporosity in Carbonaceous Materials: Development Surface Composition and Characterization碳质材料中的微孔性:表面组成与发展表征

