arrow
返回

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: A Field Experiment

delete2026-01-01
delete15
PRE
AI
S
Sebastian Krakowski *
D
Darek Haftor
J
Johannes Luger
N
Natallia Pashkevich
S
Sebastian Raisch
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03849delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Humans and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms increasingly interact on unstructured managerial tasks. We propose that tailoring this human-AI interaction to align with individuals' cognitive preferences is essential for enhancing performance. This hypothesis is examined through a field experiment in a multinational pharmaceutical firm. In the experiment, we manipulated four contextual parameters of human-AI interaction-work procedures, decision-making authority, training, and incentives-to align with sales experts' cognitive styles, categorized as either adaptors or innovators. Our results show that tailored interaction significantly improves sales performance, whereas untailored interaction results in negative treatment effects compared with both the tailored and control conditions. Qualitative evidence suggests that this negative outcome arises from role conflicts and ambiguities in untailored interaction. Exploring the mechanisms underlying these outcomes further, a mediation analysis of AI login data reveals that human-AI interaction tailoring leads sales experts to adjust their AI utilization, which contributes to the observed performance outcomes. These findings support a human-centered approach to AI that prioritizes individuals' information-processing needs and tailors their interaction with AI accordingly.
Keyword:
artificial intelligence
algorithms
behavioral theory
decision making
field experiment

期刊

Management Science 封面图
Management Science
IF:
4.9
论文数:
780
被引数:
5.0W

机构

S
sodertorn university
学者数:
566
论文数: 605
被引数: 5
U
university of zurich
学者数:
5.0W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 65
U
uppsala university
学者数:
3.7W
论文数: 3.4W
被引数: 47
U
university of geneva
学者数:
3.6W
论文数: 2.9W
被引数: 35
S
Stockholm School of Economics
学者数:
648
论文数: 993
被引数: 2.7K
学者 查看更多机构