.png){kind=icon}
返回
Hybrid assessment method for software engineering decisions
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.009.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
During software development, many decisions need to be made to guarantee the satisfaction of the stakeholders' requirements and goals. The full satisfaction of all of these requirements and goals may not be possible, requiring decisions over conflicting human interests as well as technological alternatives, with an impact on the quality and cost of the final solution. This work aims at assessing the suitability of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods to support software engineers' decisions. To fulfil this aim, a HAM ( Hybrid Assessment Method) is proposed, which gives its user the ability to perceive the influence different decisions may have on the final result. HAM is a simple and efficient method that combines one single pairwise comparison decision matrix (to determine the weights of criteria) with one classical weighted decision matrix (to prioritize the alternatives). To avoid consistency problems regarding the scale and the prioritization method. HAM uses a geometric scale for assessing the criteria and the geometric mean for determining the altemative ratings. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Multi-criteria decision making
Non-functional software requirements
Software engineering
Aggregation operators
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.8
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP层次分析法数值尺度与排序方法的比较研究
PREAI
分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容