返回
摘要
En 中文
The distinction between ignorance about a parameter and knowing only a probability distribution for that parameter is of fundamental importance in risk assessment. Brief dialogs between a hypothetical decisionmaker and a risk assessor illustrate this point, showing that the distinction has real consequences. These dialogs are followed by a short exposition that places risk analysis in a decision-theoretic framework, describes the important elements of that framework, and uses these to shed light on Terje Aven's criticism of nonprobabilistic purely objective methods. Suggestions are offered concerning a more effective approach to evaluating those methods.
Keyword:
Decision theory
interval analysis
subjective probability
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.3
论文数:
5.6K
被引数:
1.2W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
On the Need for Restricting the Probabilistic Analysis in Risk Assessments to Variability
RISK ANALYSIS
IF3.3
First-Principles Approach to the Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Systems: Combining theGWApproximation and Dynamical Mean-Field Theory强相关系统电子结构的第一性原理方法: 结合 GW 近似和动态平均场理论

