.png){kind=icon}
返回
Impact factor: Imperfect but not yet replaceable
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11192-012-0863-x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
A recent critique of the use of journal impact factors (IF) by Vanclay noted imprecision and misuses of IF. However, the substantial alternatives he suggested offer no clear improvement over IF as a single measure of scholarly impact of a journal, leaving IF as not yet replaceable.
Keyword:
Citation analysis
Impact factor
Peer review
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
8.1K
被引数:
2.2W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF Comments on the paper by Jerome Vanclay.png)
SCIENTOMETRICS
SCIENTOMETRICSIF3.5
PREAI
分享收藏Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way基于引文的指标是期刊评估中的适当工具，前提是它们准确且以知情的方式使用SCIENTOMETRICS
SCIENTOMETRICSIF3.5
PREAI
分享收藏Transcriptional Corepressors HIPK1 and HIPK2 Control Angiogenesis Via TGF-β–TAK1–Dependent MechanismPLoS Biology
OAAI
PLoS BiologyIF0
OAAI分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容