.png){kind=icon}
返回
Impact investing
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We show that investors derive nonpecuniary utility from investing in dual-objective Venture Capital (VC) funds, thus sacrificing returns. Impact funds earn 4.7 percentage points (ppts) lower internal rates of return (IRRs) ex-post than traditional VC funds. In random utility/willingness-to-pay (WTP) models investors accept 2.5-3.7 ppts lower IRRs ex ante for impact funds. The positive WTP result is robust to fund access rationing and investor heterogeneity in fund expected returns. Development organizations, foundations, financial institutions, public pensions, Europeans, and United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment signatories have high WTP. Investors with mission objectives and/or facing political pressure exhibit high WTP; those subject to legal restrictions (e.g., Employee Retirement Income Security Act) exhibit low WTP. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Impact investing
Venture capital
Private equity
Socially responsible investment
United nations principles of responsible investment (UNPRI)
Sustainable investing
Public pension funds
Willingness to pay
Random utility discrete choice models
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
12
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
5.5W
机构
引用论文
Measuring Institutional Investors' Skill at Making Private Equity Investments.png)
JOURNAL OF FINANCE
JOURNAL OF FINANCEIF9.5
PREAI
分享收藏Imaging the Surface and the Interface Atoms of an Oxide Film onAg{111}by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Experiment and Theory对 Ag{111} 扫描隧道显微镜: 实验与理论
PREAI
分享收藏Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?为什么投资者持有对社会负责的共同基金？JOURNAL OF FINANCE
OAAI
JOURNAL OF FINANCEIF9.5
OAAI分享收藏Smart institutions, foolish choices: The limited partner performance puzzleJOURNAL OF FINANCEOAAI
JOURNAL OF FINANCEIF9.5
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容