arrow
返回

Implicit Versus Explicit Timing-Separate or Shared Mechanisms?

delete2022-07-01
delete6
delete
OA
AI
S
Sophie K. Herbst *
J
Jonas Obleser
V
Virginie van Wassenhove
DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01866delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Time implicitly shapes cognition, but time is also explicitly represented, for instance, in the form of durations. Parsimoniously, the brain could use the same mechanisms for implicit and explicit timing. Yet, the evidence has been equivocal, revealing both joint versus separate signatures of timing. Here, we directly compared implicit and explicit timing using magnetoencephalography, whose temporal resolution allows investigating the different stages of the timing processes. Implicit temporal predictability was induced in an auditory paradigm by a manipulation of the foreperiod. Participants received two consecutive task instructions: discriminate pitch (indirect measure of implicit timing) or duration (direct measure of explicit timing). The results show that the human brain efficiently extracts implicit temporal statistics of sensory environments, to enhance the behavioral and neural responses to auditory stimuli, but that those temporal predictions did not improve explicit timing. In both tasks, attentional orienting in time during predictive foreperiods was indexed by an increase in alpha power over visual and parietal areas. Furthermore, pretarget induced beta power in sensorimotor and parietal areas increased during implicit compared to explicit timing, in line with the suggested role for beta oscillations in temporal prediction. Interestingly, no distinct neural dynamics emerged when participants explicitly paid attention to time, compared to implicit timing. Our work thus indicates that implicit timing shapes the behavioral and sensory response in an automatic way and is reflected in oscillatory neural dynamics, whereas the translation of implicit temporal statistics to explicit durations remains somewhat inconclusive, possibly because of the more abstract nature of this task.
Keyword:
ALPHA OSCILLATIONS
BETA OSCILLATIONS
WORKING-MEMORY
REACTION-TIME
ATTENTION
MEG
DURATION
PHASE
POTENTIALS
MODULATION

期刊

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 封面图
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
IF:
3
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

C
CEA
学者数:
3.5W
论文数: 2.3W
被引数: 62
U
Universite Paris Saclay
学者数:
7.3W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 540
引用论文

引用论文

Real-World Outcome of 173 Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC) Cases: The Experience of the Center Group for Genitourinary Tumors
err2019-01-25
err0
errOAAI
errAlmudena Martín; Javier Puente; Alvaro Pinto; Pablo Gajate; Teresa Alonso Gordoa; Enrique Grande; Ana Herrero; Constanza Maximiano; María Garrido; Isabel Gallegos; Ma Laura Villalobos; Jesús García-Donas; Edinson Caviedes; Iciar García; Javier Espinosa; Carlos Aguado; José Angel Arranz; Lourdes García; Juan Francisco Rodriguez; Javier Casinello; Laura Rodriguez
err分享
err收藏
Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Oxidative Stress-Related Genes and the Risk of a Stroke in a Polish Population—A Preliminary Study
err2021-03-19
err0
errOAAI
errEwelina Synowiec; Paulina Wigner; Natalia Cichon; Cezary Watala; Piotr Czarny; Joanna Saluk-Bijak; Elzbieta Miller; Tomasz Sliwinski; Ewa Zielinska-Nowak; Michal Bijak
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
The Perceptual Prediction Paradox
err2020-01-01
err132
errOAAI
errPress, Clare; Kok, Peter; Yon, Daniel
err分享
err收藏
How Do Expectations Shape Perception?
err2018-09-01
err501
errOAAI
errde Lange, Floris P.; Heilbron, Micha; Kok, Peter
err分享
err收藏
Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated at Academic Centers Have Improved Survival Outcomes在学术中心接受治疗的骨髓瘤患者具有改善的生存结局
err2021-11-05
err0
errOAAI
errVictoria A. Vardell; Daniel A. Ermann; Srinivas K. Tantravahi; Brian McClune; Mary Nicole Steinbach; Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin; Amandeep Godara; Douglas W. Sborov
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容