返回
Improving Human Interaction Research through Ecological Grounding
DOI:10.1525/collabra.132.png)
摘要
En 中文
In psychology, we tend to follow the general logic of falsificationism: we separate the 'context of discovery' (how we come up with theories) from the 'context of justification' (how we test them). However, when studying human interaction, separating these contexts can lead to theories with low ecological validity that do not generalize well to life outside the lab. We propose borrowing research procedures from well-established inductive methodologies in interaction research during the process of discovering new regularities and analyzing natural data without being led by theory. We introduce research procedures including the use of naturalistic study settings, analytic transcription, collections of cases, and data analysis sessions, and illustrate these with examples from a successful cross-disciplinary study. We argue that if these procedures are used systematically and transparently throughout a research cycle, they will lead to more robust and ecologically valid theories about interaction within psychology and, with some adaptation, can enhance the reproducibility of research across many other areas of psychological science.
Keyword:
experimental psychology
conversation analysis
methodology
interaction
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.2
论文数:
616
被引数:
1.5K
机构
引用论文
Novel metrics to quantify the impacts of frequency support provision methods by wind power量化风电频率支持提供方法影响的新指标
Improving the use of Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb. as anthelmintic for children in Bogor Regency改善博戈尔县儿童驱虫中使用Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb.的方法
Comparative Analysis of Metabolites and Antioxidant Potentials from Different Plant Parts of Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb.不同植物部位来源的Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb.的代谢物和抗氧化潜力的比较分析

