.png){kind=icon}
返回
Improving operational maize yield forecasting in Hungary
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.agsy.2015.10.001.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In most landscapes, accurate crop yield forecasting depends on a quantitative understanding of the relation between past weather, management and crop yield variability. We evaluated and improved the regression-based crop yield forecasting methodology currently employed in the MARS-Crop Yield Forecasting System (M-CYFS) for maize in Hungary. We quantified the effect of: 1) different statistical trends; 2) different crop growth simulation model outputs providing weekly predictors; 3) yield prediction lead times; and 4) spatial aggregation on the forecast accuracy as evaluated against statistical yield from 1993 to 2012. The LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) trend provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) in describing the yield time-series compared to the quadratic and linear trend. Using the WOFOST crop model-based predictors to explain the yield residuals derived with each of the three trends, the lowest RMSEs were obtained with the Water Limited Leaf Area Index (WLLAI) and Water Limited Above Ground Biomass (WLB) predictors in combination with the LOESS trend. The LOESS trend was used to evaluate the effect of spatially aggregating subnational yield forecasts. During the first half of the crop cycle there are only marginal differences between the NUTS (national), NUTS1 (supra-regional), NUTS2 (regional), and NUTS3 (sub-regional) level. However, the NUTS forecast had a slightly lower accuracy from the start of flowering and onwards, indicating the possible benefit of maintaining spatial detail when aggregating data. The RMSE of the forecasts started to decrease in weeks 24 and 25. Even though the relative soil moisture decreased earliest the best performing yield forecasts were associated with lead times of about 5-8 weeks before harvest and were obtained with the WLLAI and WLB as predictors. The best forecasts were associated with the critical phenological phases of flowering and grain-filling respectively occurring between weeks 27 to 30 and weeks 31 to 35. The best performing national forecast was based on NUTS1 level forecasts with an r(2) and a RMSE of respectively 0.8565 and 425.9 kg ha(-1) using WLLAI as predictor. Finally, we compared the regression-based forecasts with operational forecasts performed by the Ministry of Agriculture of Hungary and the JRC-MARS forecasts from 2007 to 2012. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keyword:
Maize
Yield forecast
Hungary
Spatial aggregation
Trends
LOESS
MARS crop yield forecasting system
WOFOST
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.1
论文数:
4.0K
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment半干旱环境下玉米作物AquaCrop模型性能评价
PREAI
分享收藏Natural history–guided omics reveals plant defensive chemistry against leafhopper pests.png)
Science
OAAI
ScienceIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容