返回
Indicator-based Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey
DOI:10.1145/3376916.png)
摘要
En 中文
For over 25 years, most multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have adopted selection criteria based on Pareto dominance. However, the performance of Parcto-based MOEAs quickly degrades when solving multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) having four or more objective functions (the so-called many-objective optimization problems), mainly because of the loss of selection pressure. Consequently, in recent years, MOEAs have been coupled with indicator-based selection mechanisms in furtherance of increasing the selection pressure so that they can properly solve many-objective optimization problems. Several research efforts have been conducted since 2003 regarding the design of the so-called indicator-based (IB) MOEAs. In this article, we present a comprehensive survey of IB-MOEAs for continuous search spaces since their origins up to the current state-of-the-art approaches. We propose a taxonomy that classifies IB-mechanisms into two main categories: (1) IB-Selection (which is divided into IB-Environmental Selection, IB-Density Estimation, and IB-Archiving) and (2) IB-Mating Selection. Each of these classes is discussed in detail in this article, emphasizing the advantages and drawbacks of the selection mechanisms. In the final part, we provide some possible paths for future research.
Keyword:
Multi-objective optimization
quality indicators
indicator-based selection
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
28
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
3.5W
机构
引用论文
Using the Averaged Hausdorff Distance as a Performance Measure in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization在进化多目标优化中使用平均Hausdorff距离作为性能度量

