.png){kind=icon}
返回
Inductive Reasoning Renewed: A Reply to Commentators
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/1047840X.2024.2366765.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The IRM provides a simple and flexible framework for the study of the social-perceptual phenomena of self-enhancement, intergroup accentuation, ingroup-favoritism, and differential accuracy of group perception, as well as the interdependencies of these phenomena. The commentaries on the target article (Krueger and colleagues) point to opportunities to further develop the model and to situate it in the context of contemporary theory and research in social and cognitive psychology. We address several critical issues of concern in this rejoinder. We organize our arguments along four themes of discussion: the model's coherence, validity, sufficiency, and its timeliness. We close by suggesting that the IRM, beyond its proper domain of applicability represents a way of thinking about social perception characterized by parsimonious assumptions and precise predictions.
Keyword:
SOCIAL PROJECTION
CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES
SELF-EVALUATION
PERCEPTION
INFORMATION
JUDGMENT
PEOPLE
MODEL
DIFFERENTIATION
CATEGORIZATION
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
1.0K
被引数:
7.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏Statistical Power and Optimal Design in Experiments in Which Samples of Participants Respond to Samples of Stimuli参与者样本对刺激样本做出反应的实验中的统计能力和最佳设计
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliageOAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容