.png){kind=icon}
返回
Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.2196/22421.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: Machine learning models have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of acute conditions. Despite growing efforts to evaluate and validate such models, little is known about how to best translate and implement these products as part of routine clinical care. Objective: This study aims to explore the factors influencing the integration of a machine learning sepsis early warning system (Sepsis Watch) into clinical workflows. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 frontline emergency department physicians and rapid response team nurses who participated in the Sepsis Watch quality improvement initiative. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We used a modified grounded theory approach to identify key themes and analyze qualitative data. Results: A total of 3 dominant themes emerged: perceived utility and trust, implementation of Sepsis Watch processes, and workforce considerations. Participants described their unfamiliarity with machine learning models. As a result, clinician trust was influenced by the perceived accuracy and utility of the model from personal program experience. Implementation of Sepsis Watch was facilitated by the easy-to-use tablet application and communication strategies that were developed by nurses to share model outputs with physicians. Barriers included the flow of information among clinicians and gaps in knowledge about the model itself and broader workflow processes. Conclusions: This study generated insights into how frontline clinicians perceived machine learning models and the barriers to integrating them into clinical workflows. These findings can inform future efforts to implement machine learning interventions in real-world settings and maximize the adoption of these interventions.
Keyword:
machine learning
sepsis
qualitative research
hospital rapid response team
emergency medicine
期刊
IF:
6
论文数:
9.7K
被引数:
5.0W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views人工智能与初级保健的未来: 英国全科医生观点的探索性定性研究
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock在开始有效的抗菌治疗之前，低血压的持续时间是人类脓毒症休克生存的关键决定因素
PREAI
分享收藏Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization定性研究中的饱和: 探索其概念化和可操作性OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014使用临床vs索赔数据的美国医院败血症的发病率和趋势，2009-2014OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容