.png){kind=icon}
返回
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/1609406919899220.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Evaluating the intercoder reliability (ICR) of a coding frame is frequently recommended as good practice in qualitative analysis. ICR is a somewhat controversial topic in the qualitative research community, with some arguing that it is an inappropriate or unnecessary step within the goals of qualitative analysis. Yet ICR assessment can yield numerous benefits for qualitative studies, which include improving the systematicity, communicability, and transparency of the coding process; promoting reflexivity and dialogue within research teams; and helping convince diverse audiences of the trustworthiness of the analysis. Few guidelines exist to help researchers negotiate the assessment of ICR in qualitative analysis. The current article explains what ICR is, reviews common arguments for and against its incorporation in qualitative analysis and offers guidance on the practical elements of performing an ICR assessment.
Keyword:
intercoder reliability
interrater reliability
qualitative analysis
interviews
coding
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
I
IF:
3.8
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?.png)
Urology
UrologyIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏Effect of lasalocid or salinomycin administration on performance and immunity following coccidia vaccination of commercial broilers施用lasalocid或盐霉素对商业肉鸡接种球虫后性能和免疫力的影响OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Multiple Sentinels in a Cooperative Breeder Synchronize Rather Than Coordinate Gazing合作繁殖中的多个哨兵同步而非协调凝视Animals
OAAI
AnimalsIF0
OAAI分享收藏Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development在定性研究数据的主题分析中尝试严谨性和可复制性; 以码本开发为例OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容