arrow
返回

Interpolating point spread function anisotropy

delete2012-12-06
delete70
delete
OA
AI
G
Gentile, M. *
C
Courbin, F.
M
Meylan, G.
DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201219739delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Planned wide-field weak lensing surveys are expected to reduce the statistical errors on the shear field to unprecedented levels. In contrast, systematic errors like those induced by the convolution with the point spread function (PSF) will not benefit from that scaling effect and will require very accurate modeling and correction. While numerous methods have been devised to carry out the PSF correction itself, modeling of the PSF shape and its spatial variations across the instrument field of view has, so far, attracted much less attention. This step is nevertheless crucial because the PSF is only known at star positions while the correction has to be performed at any position on the sky. A reliable interpolation scheme is therefore mandatory and a popular approach has been to use low-order bivariate polynomials. In the present paper, we evaluate four other classical spatial interpolation methods based on splines (B-splines), inverse distance weighting (IDW), radial basis functions (RBF) and ordinary Kriging (OK). These methods are tested on the Star-challenge part of the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) simulated data and are compared with the classical polynomial fitting (Polyfit). In all our methods we model the PSF using a single Moffat profile and we interpolate the fitted parameters at a set of required positions. This allowed us to win the Star-challenge of GREAT10, with the B-splines method. However, we also test all our interpolation methods independently of the way the PSF is modeled, by interpolating the GREAT10 star fields themselves (i.e., the PSF parameters are known exactly at star positions). We find in that case RBF to be the clear winner, closely followed by the other local methods, IDW and OK. The global methods, Polyfit and B-splines, are largely behind, especially in fields with (ground-based) turbulent PSFs. In fields with non-turbulent PSFs, all interpolators reach a variance on PSF systematics sigma(2)(sys) sys better than the 1 X 10(-7) upper bound expected by future space-based surveys, with the local interpolators performing better than the global ones.
Keyword:
gravitational lensing: weak
methods: data analysis
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Astronomy and Astrophysics 封面图
Astronomy and Astrophysics
IF:
5.8
论文数:
5.0W
被引数:
18.3W

机构

S
swiss federal institutes of technology domain
学者数:
9.0W
论文数: 8.0W
被引数: 163
引用论文

引用论文

Distribution of recurrent inhibition among motoneurones
err1961-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errJ. C. Eccles; Rosamond M. Eccles; A. Iggo; M. Ito
err分享
err收藏
Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the galaxy cluster Abell 209
err2007-02-12
err21
errOAAI
errPaulin-Henriksson, S.; Antonuccio-Delogu, V.; Haines, C. P.; Radovich, M.; Mercurio, A.; Becciani, U.
err分享
err收藏
Image analysis for cosmology: results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
err2012-06-13
err130
errOAAI
errKitching, T. D.; Balan, S. T.; Bridle, S.; Cantale, N.; Courbin, F.; Eifler, T.; Gentile, M.; Gill, M. S. S.; Harmeling, S.; Heymans, C.; Hirsch, M.; Honscheid, K.; Kacprzak, T.; Kirkby, D.; Margala, D.; Massey, R. J.; Melchior, P.; Nurbaeva, G.; Patton, K.; Rhodes, J.; Rowe, B. T. P.; Taylor, A. N.; Tewes, M.; Viola, M.; Witherick, D.; Voigt, L.; Young, J.; Zuntz, J.
err分享
err收藏
Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership
err1999-07-01
err0
errOAAI
errEric van Damme; Sjaak Hurkens
err分享
err收藏
History of the hard stuff
err2009-10-28
err0
errOAAI
errJim Lapsley
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Cosmological systematics beyond nuisance parameters: form-filling functions
err2009-11-11
err36
errOAAI
errKitching, T. D.; Amara, A.; Abdalla, F. B.; Joachimi, B.; Refregier, A.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容