arrow
返回

Interpretable regression trees using conformal prediction

delete2018-05-01
delete29
PRE
AI
U
Ulf Johansson *
H
Henrik Linusson
T
Tuve Löfström
H
Henrik Boström
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.041delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
A key property of conformal predictors is that they are valid, i.e., their error rate on novel data is bounded by a preset level of confidence. For regression, this is achieved by turning the point predictions of the underlying model into prediction intervals. Thus, the most important performance metric for evaluating conformal regressors is not the error rate, but the size of the prediction intervals, where models generating smaller (more informative) intervals are said to be more efficient. State-of-the-art conformal regressors typically utilize two separate predictive models: the underlying model providing the center point of each prediction interval, and a normalization model used to scale each prediction interval according to the estimated level of difficulty for each test instance. When using a regression tree as the underlying model, this approach may cause test instances falling into a specific leaf to receive different prediction intervals. This clearly deteriorates the interpretability of a conformal regression tree compared to a standard regression tree, since the path from the root to a leaf can no longer be translated into a rule explaining all predictions in that leaf. In fact, the model cannot even be interpreted on its own, i.e., without reference to the corresponding normalization model. Current practice effectively presents two options for constructing conformal regression trees: to employ a (global) normalization model, and thereby sacrifice interpretability; or to avoid normalization, and thereby sacrifice both efficiency and individualized predictions. In this paper, two additional approaches are considered, both employing local normalization: the first approach estimates the difficulty by the standard deviation of the target values in each leaf, while the second approach employs Mondrian conformal prediction, which results in regression trees where each rule (path from root node to leaf node) is independently valid. An empirical evaluation shows that the first approach is as efficient as current state-of-the-art approaches, thus eliminating the efficiency vs. interpretability trade-off present in existing methods. Moreover, it is shown that if a validity guarantee is required for each single rule, as provided by the Mondrian approach, a penalty with respect to efficiency has to be paid, but it is only substantial at very high confidence levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Conformal prediction
Interpretability
Predictive regression
Regression trees
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Expert Systems with Applications 封面图
Expert Systems with Applications
IF:
7.5
论文数:
3.0W
被引数:
10.2W

机构

J
jonkoping university
学者数:
1.2K
论文数: 1.4K
被引数: 0
U
University of Boras
学者数:
768
论文数: 920
被引数: 1.4K
R
Royal Institute of Technology
学者数:
1.8W
论文数: 1.8W
被引数: 25
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Regression conformal prediction with random forests
err2014-07-09
err126
errOAAI
errJohansson, Ulf; Bostrom, Henrik; Lofstrom, Tuve; Linusson, Henrik
err分享
err收藏
Functional trees
err2004-06-01
err227
errOAAI
errGama, J
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Rheology of shape-transformed human red cells
err1978-10-01
err0
PREAI
errHerbert J. Meiselman
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Logistic model trees逻辑模型树
err2005-05-01
err943
errOAAI
errLandwehr, N; Hall, M; Frank, E
err分享
err收藏
Realization of a half-metallic state on bilayer WSe2 using doping transition metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) in its interlayer
err2018-04-19
err0
PREAI
errGuang Yang; Yanmin Yang; Hongran Ma; Xiujuan Mao; Congcong Li; Jie Li; Qiang Zhang; Zhidong Zhang; Fuxing Yin; Jia Li
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Changes in outdoor lighting in Germany from 2012-2016
err2017-12-29
err0
errOAAI
errChristopher C. M. Kyba; Theres Kuester; Helga U Kuechly
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容