.png){kind=icon}
返回
Interventional EUS (with videos)
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.021.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the related articles feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking. In such cases large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2016 for relevant articles by using key words such as endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasonography, and EUS, combined with other relevant terms such as therapeutic, interventional, and adverse events, among others. Articles reporting on specific procedures such as pseudocyst drainage, biliary/pancreatic drainage, celiac plexus neurolysis, and gastric variceal therapy, among others, were also searched for individually with appropriate relevant terms. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.
Keyword:
CELIAC PLEXUS NEUROLYSIS
GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE
UNRESECTABLE PANCREATIC-CANCER
ENDOSCOPIC TRANSMURAL DRAINAGE
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
GASTRIC FUNDAL VARICES
FLUID COLLECTIONS
FAILED ERCP
PSEUDOCYST DRAINAGE
ETHANOL-LAVAGE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.5
论文数:
2.7W
被引数:
2.4W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan日本内镜超声引导下胆道引流治疗恶性胆道梗阻的多中心回顾性研究
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: cumulative experience of 101 procedures at a single center.png)
ENDOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
PREAI
分享收藏Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis vs. celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized multicenter trialENDOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容