.png){kind=icon}
返回
Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1002/wcc.500.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
As globalization and other pressures intensify the economic, social and biophysical connections between people and places, it seems likely that adaptation responses intended to ameliorate the impacts of climate change might end up shifting risks and vulnerability between people and places. Building on earlier conceptual work in maladaptation and other literature, this article explores the extent to which concerns about vulnerability redistribution have influenced different realms of adaptation practice. The review leads us to conclude that the potential for adaptation to redistribute risk or vulnerability is being given only sparse-and typically superficial-attention by practitioners. Concerns about maladaptation', and occasionally vulnerability redistribution specifically, are mentioned on the margins but do not significantly influence the way adaptation choices are made or evaluated by policy makers, project planners or international funds. In research, the conceptual work on maladaptation is yet to translate into a significant body of empirical literature on the distributional impacts of real-world adaptation activities, which we argue calls into question our current knowledge base about adaptation. These gaps are troubling, because a process of cascading adaptation endeavors globally seems likely to eventually re-distribute risks or vulnerabilities to communities that are already marginalized and vulnerable. We conclude by discussing the implications that the potential for vulnerability redistribution might have for the governance of adaptation processes, and offer some reflections on how research might contribute to addressing gaps in knowledge and in practice. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keyword:
CLIMATE-CHANGE
SUSTAINABLE ADAPTATION
CARBON LEAKAGE
RISK
TELECONNECTIONS
MALADAPTATION
PERSPECTIVE
DISCOURSE
TRADE
HARD
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
10.3
论文数:
870
被引数:
8.7K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴恐惧的观察条件中的选择性关联。OAAI
OAAI分享收藏The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Drug Azathioprine Induces Autophagy via mTORC1 and the Unfolded Protein Response Sensor PERK炎症性肠病药物硫唑嘌呤通过mTORC1和未折叠蛋白反应传感器PERK诱导自噬OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容