.png){kind=icon}
返回
Is Most Published Research Really False?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054104.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
There has been an increasing concern in both the scientific and lay communities that most published medical findings are false. But what does it mean to be false? Here we describe the range of definitions of false discoveries in the scientific literature. We summarize the philosophical, statistical, and experimental evidence for each type of false discovery. We discuss common underpinning problems with the scientific and data analytic practices and point to tools and behaviors that can be implemented to reduce the problems with published scientific results.
Keyword:
science-wise false discovery rate
reproducibility
replicability
false discoveries
meta-analysis
reliability research
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8.7
论文数:
211
被引数:
2.4K
机构
引用论文
Spin-trapping evidence that graded myocardial ischemia alters post-ischemic superoxide production
PREAI
分享收藏Altered Spontaneous Brain Activity in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Accompanied by Depressive Symptoms, as Revealed by Regional Homogeneity and Functional Connectivity in the Prefrontal-Limbic System.png)
PLoS ONEOAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容