arrow
返回

Is Replication Possible Without Fidelity?

delete2023-12-01
delete7
delete
OA
AI
M
Michelle R. Ellefson *
D
Daniel M. Oppenheimer
DOI:10.1037/met0000473delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Failure of replication attempts in experimental psychology might extend beyond p-hacking, publication bias or hidden moderators; reductions in experimental power can be caused by violations of fidelity to a set of experimental protocols. In this article, we run a series of simulations to systematically explore how manipulating fidelity influences effect size. We find statistical patterns that mimic those found in ManyLabs style replications and meta-analyses, suggesting that fidelity violations are present in many replications attempts in psychology. Scholars in intervention science, medicine, and education have developed methods of improving and measuring fidelity, and as replication becomes more mainstream in psychology, the field would benefit from adopting such approaches as well. Translational Abstract Failure of replication attempts in experimental psychology might extend beyond p-hacking, publication bias or hidden moderators; reductions in experimental power can be caused by violations of fidelity to a set of experimental protocols. In this article, we run a series of simulations to systematically explore how manipulating fidelity influences effect size. We find statistical patterns that mimic those found in ManyLabs style replications and meta-analyses, suggesting that fidelity violations are present in many replications attempts in psychology. Scholars in intervention science, medicine, and education have developed methods of improving and measuring fidelity, and as replication becomes more mainstream in psychology, the field would benefit from adopting such approaches as well.
Keyword:
replication
fidelity
effect size
heterogeneity
simulations

期刊

Psychological Methods 封面图
Psychological Methods
IF:
7.8
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
2.1W

机构

C
Carnegie Mellon University
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.4W
被引数: 2.7W
U
University of Cambridge
学者数:
7.7W
论文数: 7.1W
被引数: 13.7W
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息