.png){kind=icon}
返回
Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
How Uber affects public transit ridership is a relevant policy question facing cities worldwide. Theoretically, Uber's effect on transit is ambiguous: while Uber is an alternative mode of travel, it can also increase the reach and flexibility of public transit's fixed-route, fixed-schedule service. We estimate the effect of Uber on public transit ridership using a difference-in-differences design that exploits variation across U.S. metropolitan areas in both the intensity of Uber penetration and the timing of Uber entry. We find that Uber is a complement for the average transit agency, increasing ridership by five percent after two years. This average effect masks considerable heterogeneity, with Uber increasing ridership more in larger cities and for smaller transit agencies.
Keyword:
Public transportation
Ride-hailing
Technological innovation
First mile/last mile
Difference-in-differences
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
2.3K
被引数:
7.3K
机构
引用论文
Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion.png)
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWOAAI
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWIF11.6
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容