.png){kind=icon}
返回
Judgment Errors in Surgical Care
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1097/XCS.0000000000001011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
BACKGROUND: Human error is impossible to eliminate, particularly in systems as complex as healthcare. The extent to which judgment errors in particular impact surgical patient care or lead to harm is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP (2018) procedures from a single institution with 30-day morbidity or mortality were examined. Medical records were reviewed and evaluated for judgment errors. Preoperative variables associated with judgment errors were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the surgical patients who experienced a morbidity or mortality, 18% (31 of 170) experienced an error in judgment during their hospitalization. Patients with hepatobiliary procedure (odds ratio [OR] 5.4 [95% CI 1.23 to 32.75], p = 0.002), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 4.8 [95% CI 1.2 to 18.8], p = 0.025), severe COPD (OR 6.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 22.1], p = 0.007), or with infected wounds (OR 8.2 [95% CI 2.6 to 25.8], p < 0.001) were at increased risk for judgment errors. CONCLUSIONS: Specific procedure types and patients with certain preoperative variables had higher risk for judgment errors during their hospitalization. Errors in judgment adversely impacted the outcomes of surgical patients who experienced morbidity or mortality in this cohort. Preventing or mitigating errors and closely monitoring patients after an error in judgment is prudent and may improve surgical safety.
Keyword:
COGNITIVE BIAS
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care A Systematic Review定义和研究外科护理中的错误.png)
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ANNALS OF SURGERYIF6.4
PREAI
分享收藏
What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容