.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Most individual life insurance policies lapse, with lapsers cross-subsidizing non-lapsers. We show that policies and lapse patterns predicted by standard rational expectations models are the opposite of those observed empirically. We propose two behavioral models consistent with the evidence: (i) consumers forget to pay premiums and (ii) consumers understate future liquidity needs. We conduct two surveys with a large insurer. New buyers believe that their own lapse probabilities are small compared to the insurer's actual experience. For recent lapsers, forgetfulness accounts for 37.8 percent of lapses while unexpected liquidity accounts for 15.4 percent.
Keyword:
HEALTH-INSURANCE
SELF-CONTROL
PLAN CHOICE
OVERCONFIDENCE
POLICIES
RATES
期刊
IF:
11.6
论文数:
5.0K
被引数:
7.5W
机构
引用论文
Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.png)
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW.png)
OAAI
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWIF11.6
OAAI.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
查看更多内容