返回
Logic, probability, and human reasoning
DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.006.png)
摘要
En 中文
This review addresses the long-standing puzzle of how logic and probability fit together in human reasoning. Many cognitive scientists argue that conventional logic cannot underlie deductions, because it never requires valid conclusions to be withdrawn - not even if they are false; it treats conditional assertions implausibly; and it yields many vapid, although valid, conclusions. A new paradigm of probability logic allows conclusions to be withdrawn and treats conditionals more plausibly, although it does not address the problem of vapidity. The theory of mental models solves all of these problems. It explains how people reason about probabilities and postulates that the machinery for reasoning is itself probabilistic. Recent investigations accordingly suggest a Way to integrate probability and deduction.
Keyword:
MENTAL MODEL-THEORY
DUAL PROCESSES
ILLUSORY INFERENCES
CONDITIONALS
PSYCHOLOGY
RATIONALITY
COGNITION
CONSISTENCY
ATMOSPHERE
CAUSATION
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
17.2
论文数:
3.6K
被引数:
3.5W
机构
引用论文
Production and specificity of monoclonal antibodies against nodularin conjugated through N-methyldehydrobutyrine
Toxicon
IF0
A Theory and a Computational Model of Spatial Reasoning With Preferred Mental Models
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
IF5.8
Residue pattern and dietary intake of persistent organochlorine compounds in foodstuffs from Vietnam

