.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
This paper demonstrates that prospect theory's (PT) predictions differ dramatically from what strategy scholars have inferred. PT's value function predicts negative risk-return associations for high performers and positive for low performers, directly contrary to the strategy literature. In addition, PT's isolation assumption means most firm choices should appear as mixed gambles. Prior PT-based theorizing in strategy implicitly assumed that the firm faced unmixed gambles. Finally, it demonstrates that PT does not make the general predictions most strategy researchers have assumed, but rather PT's predictions depend on a full range of parametric and choice characteristics that strategy scholars have ignored. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
prospect theory
risk taking
behavioral theory
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容