arrow
返回

LOSS AVERSION AND LABOR SUPPLY

delete2004-05-01
delete68
delete
OA
AI
L
Lorenz Göette *
F
Fehr, Ernst
H
Huffman, David
DOI:10.1162/154247604323067934delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In many occupations, workers' labor supply choices are constrained by institutional rules regulating labor time and effort provision. This renders explicit tests of the neoclassical theory of labor supply difficult. Here we present evidence from studies examining labor supply responses in neoclassical environments in which workers are free to choose when and how much to work. Despite the favorable environment, the results cast doubt on the neoclassical model. They are, however, consistent with a model of reference-dependent preferences exhibiting loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. (JEL: J22, B49)

期刊

Journal of the European Economic Association 封面图
Journal of the European Economic Association
IF:
3.3
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
6.6K

机构

U
university of zurich
学者数:
5.1W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 65
I
IZA Institute Labor Economics
学者数:
497
论文数: 489
被引数: 1
引用论文

引用论文

Goals as reference points
err1999-02-01
err771
PREAI
errHeath, C; Larrick, RP; Wu, G
err分享
err收藏