.png){kind=icon}
返回
Making Statistics Clinically Meaningful
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.2147/clep.s601451.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The growth in evidence-based medicine clearly benefits patient care but it is important that evidence is accessible and usable. Translating research results into usable, meaningful information can be challenging and impede the implementation of robust evidence. There are many aspects to making the statistical parts of a research study actionable for practicing clinicians and policy makers. These include ensuring that the right questions are asked, the study is designed appropriately, and results are transparent and applicable to the clinical setting. In this perspectives-style article we offer guidance on these considerations by highlighting several approaches that we have found effective for improving the interpretability and practical application of statistical findings. Our over-arching aim is to stimulate interdisciplinary dialogue throughout the research process. Specifically, we discuss the interpretation of p-values, effect estimates, differences between means, scaling regression coefficients, unadjusted/adjusted estimates, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, absolute and relative risk, and suggest how clinical meaning can be enhanced by presenting the same information in different but complementary ways. We conclude with a recommendation that study teams prioritize interdisciplinary discussions around clinical meaningfulness throughout our research studies to maximize their clinical impact.
Keyword:
evidence-based medicine
biostatistics
implementation
clinical practice
public health policy
期刊
C
IF:
3.2
论文数:
72
被引数:
0
机构
引用论文
Motivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a physiotherapist-led, behavioural change intervention versus usual care in adults with intermittent claudication.png)
BMJ Open
OAAI
BMJ OpenIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations统计检验、p值、置信区间和功效: 误解指南OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Do small effects matter more in vulnerable populations? an investigation using Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) cohorts在弱势群体中，小影响更重要吗？使用环境对儿童健康结果 (ECHO) 队列的影响进行的调查BMC PUBLIC HEALTHOAAI
BMC PUBLIC HEALTHIF3.6
OAAI分享收藏Update to the study protocol, including statistical analysis plan, for the multicentre, randomised controlled OuTSMART trial: a combined screening/treatment programme to prevent premature failure of renal transplants due to chronic rejection in patients with HLA antibodiesTrialsOAAI
TrialsIF0
OAAI分享收藏Assessing tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy from self-report, urinary cotinine and NNAL: a validation study using the New Hampshire Birth Cohort StudyBMJ OpenOAAI
BMJ OpenIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容