.png){kind=icon}
返回
Managerial responsibility
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/1540-6210.00288.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The concept of managerial responsibility is a shining thread in the literature of public administration, but its definition within our constitutional scheme remains elusive. How will we know responsible public management when we see it? We propose one answer: Public administration should be conducted according to what we term a precept of managerial responsibility which involves four interrelated elements derived from the classical literature of public administration: judgment, accountability balance, and rationality. We apply this precept to one of the most vexing problems of public administration theory and practice, institutional reform litigation. This application illustrates how the precept solves a major theoretical problem of American public administration by defining a role for administrative officers that fully comports with the Madisonian scheme of separated institutions-legislative, executive, and judicial-sharing power.
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.9
论文数:
5.5K
被引数:
1.3W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Genome size estimates for two important freshwater molluscs, the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and the schistosomiasis vector snail (Biomphalaria glabrata).png)
Genome
GenomeIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容