.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Maritime Integrated Systems Architecture in the Digital Era: A Systematic Review of Model-Based Approaches, Interoperability, and Resilience
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
E
L
D
M
W
A
DOI：10.3390/asi9050098.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: Maritime operations increasingly rely on integrated, secure, and resilient architectures, yet the associated body of knowledge remains fragmented across conceptual, operational, logical, methodological, and governance-oriented perspectives. Objective: Our aim is to systematically review the literature on maritime integrated systems architecture in order to identify dominant themes, methodological tendencies, enabling technologies, and unresolved research gaps. Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed studies published in English were included when they addressed integrated systems architecture, or closely related architectural approaches, in maritime or naval contexts. Studies centred exclusively on isolated components, non-maritime settings without clear architectural transferability, or insufficient technical or methodological detail were excluded. Information sources: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and IMarEST. Searches were carried out between January and March 2025, with the final search update for all sources completed in March 2025. Methods: The review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Three reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed methodological limitations and risk of bias using a review-specific qualitative appraisal framework, and evaluated the risk of bias due to missing results at the synthesis level. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus, with third-reviewer arbitration when necessary. The synthesis combined qualitative thematic analysis across eleven predefined analytical categories with descriptive bibliometric and thematic mapping procedures. Results: Of 300 identified records, 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. Across non-mutually exclusive analytical categories, the literature was concentrated in Integrated Systems Architecture (52 studies), Development Processes (42), and Conceptual Models (37), whereas Zachman-based Methodology (4) and Maturity Models (3) were only marginally represented. Three recurrent patterns were observed across the corpus: the central role of cybersecurity and risk governance in architectural design; the growing importance of information technology and operational technology convergence for resilient monitoring, coordination, and decision support; and the increasing use of model-based and model-driven approaches to address architectural complexity. Overall confidence in the principal synthesized findings was judged to be moderate. Limitations: The review was limited to six databases and English-language publications, and the included studies varied in reporting depth, methodological transparency, and degree of empirical validation. Conclusions: The review organizes the field into a multilevel taxonomy spanning conceptual and operational models, logical and layered views, development processes, reference architectures, enabling technologies, and maturity-related perspectives. Taken together, the findings suggest that research in this area has progressed more clearly in architectural representation and integration than in long-term evaluation, particularly with regard to the practical operationalization of Zachman-based approaches and the development of maritime-specific maturity assessment frameworks. Funding: This review received no external funding. Registration: The review was not prospectively registered, and no publicly accessible protocol was prepared.
Keywords:
maritime integrated systems architecture
systematic review
cybersecurity
IT/OT convergence
model driven architecture
model-based systems engineering
reference architectures
interoperability
governance
decision support
Journal
IF:
3.7
Papers:
934
Citations:
1.9K
Organization
Cited Papers