.png){kind=icon}
返回
Matched comparison between external aortic root support and valve-sparing root replacement
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321840.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
ObjectivesDifferences in indication and technique make a randomised comparison between valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) and personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) challenging. We performed a propensity score (PS)-matched comparison of PEARS and VSRR for syndromic root aneurysm. MethodsPatients in the PEARS 200 Database and Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (undergoing VSRR) with connective tissue disease operated electively for root aneurysm <60 mm with aortic regurgitation (AR) <1/4 were included. Using a PS analysis, 80 patients in each cohort were matched. Survival, freedom from reintervention and from AR >= 2/4 were estimated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. ResultsMedian follow-up was 25 and 55 months for 159 PEARS and 142 VSRR patients. Seven (4.4%) patients undergoing PEARS required an intervention for coronary injury or impingement, resulting in one death (0.6%). After VSRR, there were no early deaths, 10 (7%) reinterventions for bleeding and 1 coronary intervention. Survival for matched cohorts at 5 years was similar (PEARS 98% vs VSRR 99%, p=0.99). There was no difference in freedom from valve or ascending aortic/arch reintervention between matched groups. Freedom from AR >= 2/4 at 5 years in the matched cohorts was 97% for PEARS vs 92% for VSRR (p=0.55). There were no type A dissections. ConclusionsVSRR and PEARS offer favourable mid-term survival, freedom from reintervention and preservation of valve function. Both treatments deserve their place in the surgical repertoire, depending on a patient's disease stage. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and different follow-ups in both cohorts.
Keyword:
Aortic Aneurysm
Marfan Syndrome
Aortic Valve Insufficiency
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.4
论文数:
2.0W
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
Surgical management of aortic root disease in Marfan syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.png)
HEART
HEARTIF4.4
PREAI
分享收藏Differential cross sections for high energy elastic hadron-hadron scattering in nonperturbative QCD
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏PEARS procedure and the difficulty to provide evidence for its benefitsEUROPEAN HEART JOURNALOAAI
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNALIF35.6
OAAI分享收藏SLIM: Simultaneous Logic-in-Memory Computing Exploiting Bilayer Analog OxRAM DevicesSCIENTIFIC REPORTSOAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容