.png){kind=icon}
返回
Math approach training changes implicit identification with math: A close preregistered replication
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104059.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Kawakami et al. (2008) offer an approach training intervention to strengthen women's implicit identification with math. This intervention is especially interesting regarding data suggesting that the low implicit identification with math among women and the gender gap in science reinforce each other (Nosek et al., 2009). Nevertheless, Kawakami et al.'s data only provide quite modest evidential value in favor of the effectiveness of this intervention (notably because of the two critical p values being very close to 0.05 and of the small sample sizes). In the present manuscript, we offer a preregistered replication of Kawakami et al. with a substantially larger sample size and a novel implementation of approach and avoidance (the VAAST; Rougier et al., 2018). In a Pilot Experiment (N = 150), we validate the VAAST-based approach/avoidance training as a way to create identification for novel stimuli (d(s) = 1.17, p < .001). We then replicate Kawakami et al.'s work, revealing that women who approached math (instead of avoiding it) had a higher identification with math (d(s) = 0.30, p = .037). This preregistered replication increased evidential value in favor of the effectiveness of the approach training by a factor of 2.57, now providing strong support for the effectiveness of the training (Jeffreys, 1961). A meta-analysis of the original data and the replication revealed a small-to-medium effect of this intervention (d(s) = 0.40, CI95% [0.14; 0.65]). These results are discussed in regard to theories explaining how actions affect evaluative response as well as current interventions in the literature.
Keyword:
Approach and avoidance training
Implicit identification
Preregistered replication
Evidential value
VAAST
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.1
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress信誉革命对生产力、创造力和进步的影响OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses等效性检验: t检验、相关性和荟萃分析的实用入门OAAI
OAAI分享收藏National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement性别科学刻板印象的民族差异预测了科学和数学成就的民族性别差异OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容