Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research

doi:10.1177/0739456x13513614

Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research

2014-01-07

0

PRE

AI

DOI：10.1177/0739456x13513614

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

Plan quality evaluation researchers typically evaluate plans in relation to whether they contain certain desirable features. Best practice dictates that plans be evaluated by at least two readers and that researchers report a measure of the extent to which the readers agree on whether the plans contain the desirable features. Established practice for assessing this agreement has been subject to criticism. We summarize this criticism, discuss an alternative approach to assessing agreement, and provide recommendations for plan quality evaluation researchers to follow to improve the quality of their data and the manner in which they assess and report that quality.

Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research

摘要

AI总结

期刊

机构

引用论文