arrow
返回

Measuring science: An exploration

delete1996-11-12
delete73
delete
OA
AI
J
James D. Adams *
Z
Zvi Griliches
DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12664delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This paper examines the available United States data on academic research and development (R&D) expenditures and the number of papers published and the number of citations to these papers as possible measures of ''output'' of this enterprise, We look at these numbers for science and engineering as a whole, for five selected major fields, and at the individual university field level. The published data in Science and Engineering Indicators imply sharply diminishing returns to academic R&D using published papers as an ''output'' measure, These data are quite problematic Using a newer set of data on papers and citations, based on an ''expanding'' set of journals and the newly released Bureau of Economic Analysis R&D deflators, changes the picture drastically, eliminating the appearance of diminishing returns but raising the question of why the input prices of academic R&D are rising so much faster than either the gross domestic product deflator or the implicit R&D deflator in industry, A production function analysis of such data at the individual field level fallows. It indicates significant diminishing returns to ''own'' R&D, with the R&D coefficients hovering around 0.5 for estimates with paper numbers as the dependent variable and around 0.6 if total citations are used as the dependent variable, When we substitute scientists and engineers in place of R&D as the right-hand side variables, the coefficient on papers rises from 0.5 to 0.8, and the coefficient on citations rises from 0.6 to 0.9, indicating systematic measurement problems with R&D as the sole input into the production of scientific output. But allowing for individual university field effects drives these numbers down significantly below unity. Because in the aggregate both paper numbers and citations are growing as fast or faster than R&D, this finding can be interpreted as leaving a major, yet unmeasured, role for the contribution of spillovers from other fields, other universities, and other countries.
Keyword:
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
INDUSTRIAL-RESEARCH
ACADEMIC RESEARCH
KNOWLEDGE
ISSUES
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
论文数:
10.8W
被引数:
73.5W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

High burden and frailty: association with poor cognitive performance in older caregivers living in rural areas
err2017-12-04
err0
errOAAI
errAllan Gustavo Brigola; Bruna Moretti Luchesi; Tiago da Silva Alexandre; Keika Inouye; Eneida Mioshi; Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini
err分享
err收藏
Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis
err2008-01-01
err0
PREAI
errWolfgang Weidner; Florian M. E. Wagenlehner; Kurt G. Naber
err分享
err收藏
Poland From Partitions to EU Accession
err
IF0
err2018-01-01
err0
PREAI
errPiotr Koryś
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Molecular and mycotoxin characterization of Fusarium graminearum isolates obtained from wheat at a single field in Argentina
err2015-12-05
err0
PREAI
errLeonel M. Ortega; María I. Dinolfo; Andrea L. Astoreca; Enrique J. Alberione; Sebastián A. Stenglein; Teresa M. Alconada
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容