返回
摘要
En 中文
To be rational is to be able to reason. Thirty years ago psychologists believed that human reasoning depended on formal rules of inference akin to those of a logical calculus. This hypothesis ran into difficulties, which led to an alternative view: reasoning depends on envisaging the possibilities consistent with the starting point-a perception of the world, a set of assertions, a memory, or some mixture of them. We construct mental models of each distinct possibility and derive a conclusion from them. The theory predicts systematic errors in our reasoning, and the evidence corroborates this prediction. Yet, our ability to use counterexamples to refute invalid inferences provides a foundation for rationality. On this account, reasoning is a simulation of the world fleshed out with our knowledge, not a formal rearrangement of the logical skeletons of sentences.
Keyword:
abduction
deduction
induction
logic
rationality
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
P
IF:
9.1
论文数:
10.8W
被引数:
73.5W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Overexpression of protease‐activated receptors‐1,‐2, and‐4 (PAR‐1, ‐2, and ‐4) in prostate cancer
The Prostate
IF0
EXTENSIONAL VERSUS INTUITIVE REASONING - THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY IN PROBABILITY JUDGMENT外延推理与直觉推理 -- 概率判断中的合取谬误
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
IF5.8

